Remedies
remedies is a key legal principle explored in case law.
Cases Applying This Concept
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.398 U.S. 375
- GONZALEZ, BARBARA HALE v. ROYALTON EQUINE VETERINARY SERVICESCA 14-01289
- FRONT RANGE EQUINE RESCUE; The Humane Society of the United States; Marin Humane Society; Horses for Life Foundation; Return to Freedom; Ramona Cordova; Krystle Smith; Cassie Gross; Deborah Trahan; Barbara Sink; Chief David Bald Eagle; Chief Arvol Looking Horse; Tanya Littlewolf; Roxanne Talltree-Douglas; Foundation to Protect New Mexico Wildlife; Sandy Schaefer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and State of New Mexico, Plaintiff Intervenor-Appellant, v. Tom VILSACK, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Elisabeth A. Hagen, Under Secretary for Food Safety, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Alfred A. Almanza, Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees, and Responsible Transportation, LLC; Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation; Rains Natural Meats; Valley Meat Company, LLC; Chevaline, LLC; International Equine Business Association; New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association; South Dakota Stockgrowers Association; Rancherscattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America; Marcy Britton; Bill and Jan Wood; Leroy Wetz; Shirley Wetz; Doug Johnson; Judy Johnson; Kujyukuri, Ltd.; United Horsemen; Scenic View Ranch, Defendants Intervenors Appellees. American Farm Bureau Federation; National Cattlemen's Beef Association; New Mexico Farm and Livestock Bureau, Amici Curiae782 F.3d 565
- Cristina Raybourn v. Changing Leads Equine Rescue; Woodson Hill Equestrian Center, LLCWD86708
- In Re: Mississippi Rules of Evidence89-R-99002-SCT
- In Re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence CodeSC22-1040
- In Re: Appointment to the Committee on Rules of Evidence909 Supreme Court Rules
- In Re: Amendment of Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 404893 Supreme Court Rules
- In Re: Amendment of Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 404893 Supreme Court Rules
- In Re: Amendment of Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 404893 Supreme Court Rules
- In Re: Appointment to the Committee on Rule of Evidence987 Supreme Court Rules
- In Re Amendments to Rule 902 of the Arkansas Rules of Evidence2025 Ark. 116
- In Re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence CodeSC19-107
- In Re: Appointment to the Committee on Rules of Evidence958 Supreme Court Rules
- Matter of Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Ctr. v. Myron M.2025 NY Slip Op 02270
- In Re: Mississippi Rules of Evidence89-R-99002-SCT
- Matter of Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Facility v. Sammy M.2021 NY Slip Op 06324
- Jeremy LAPACHET v. CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC.313 F. Supp. 3d 1183
- Matter of Marvin P. (Mid-Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Ctr.)222 A.D.3d 736
- Matter of Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Facility v. Sammy M.2021 NY Slip Op 06324
- BOARD OF FORENSIC DOCUMENT EXAMINERS, INC., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees.922 F.3d 827
- R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union[2017] UKSC 5
- J. Aron & Co. v. Chown[2014] EWCA Civ 1013
- Gouriet v. Union of Post Office Workers[1978] AC 435
- Slip Knot Corp. v. Overnight Express220 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2000)
- Metropolitan Asylum District v. Hill1881) 6 App. Cas. 193
- Merricks v. Mastercard Inc[2021] CAT 1
- Thomson v. Commissioner for Consumer Affairs(1999) 64 S.A.S.R. 225
- Graham v. Florida560 U.S. 48 (2010)
- Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dodd(1901) 4 CCC 177
- Pena v. City of Los Angeles715 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. 2013)
- Tamlin v. Hannaford[1950] 1 KB 18
- Saad v. City of Montreal2015 SCC 11
- City of London v. Samede(2009) 1 WLR 673
- Wilson v. First County Trust Ltd (No 2)[2003] UKHL 40
- State of New South Wales v. Kantor(2005) 62 NSWLR 542
- Deutsche Bank AG v. Total Global Steel Ltd[2012] EWHC 1201 (Comm)
- Harrison v. Harrison(1873) LR 8 Ch App 342
- R (On the application of Keyu) v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs[2015] UKSC 69
- Mustafa v. Secretary of State for the Home Department[2022] EWCA Civ 1230
- Robertson v. Swift[2014] UKSC 47
- Collins v. British Airways[2017] EWCA Civ 205
- Percy v. Church of Scotland[2006] UKHL 79
- HKRUK II (CHC) Ltd v. Heaney[2010] EWHC 2245 (Ch)
- Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland[1993] AC 789
- EnergySolutions EU Ltd v. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority[2017] UKSC 34
- R (Evans) v. Attorney General[2015] UKSC 21
- F v. West Berkshire Health Authority[1991] 2 AC 1
- Cramaso LLP v. Ogilvie-Grant[2014] UKSC 9
- Spring v. Guardian Assurance plc[1995] 2 AC 296
- The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v. United Utilities Water Ltd[2024] UKSC 44
Exam Application
Apply remedies by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.