South Asian Legal Systems
south-asian-legal-systems is a key legal principle explored in case law.
Cases Applying This Concept
- In Re: FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION723 F. Supp. 2d 761
- In re FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION284 F.R.D. 207
- In RE: VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Cargo Agents, Inc.; International Transport Management Corp.; And Manaco International Forwarders, Inc.; Appellants in 15-3853 Martens Cars of Washington, Inc.; Hudson Charleston Acquisition, LLC D/B/A Hudson Nissan; John O'Neil Johnson Toyota, LLC; Hudson Gastonia Acquisition, LLC; HC Acquisition, LLC D/B/A Toyota of Bristol; Desert European Motorcars, Ltd; Hodges Imported Cars, Inc. D/B/A Hodges Subaru; Scotland Car Yard Enterprises D/B/A San Rafael Mitsubishi; Hartley Buick/ GMC Truck, Inc. D/B/A Hartley Honda; Panama City Automotive Group, Inc. D/B/A John Lee Nissan; Empire Nissan of Santa Rosa, LLC, Appellants in 15-3354 End Payor Plaintiffs; Truck and Equipment Dealer Plaintiffs, Appellants in 15-3355846 F.3d 71
- In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869287 F.R.D. 1
- In re SULFURIC ACID ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Appeal of Ohio Chemical Services, Cross-Appeal of Falconbridge, Ltd.703 F.3d 1004
- In re AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. In re Occupant Safety Systems. This Document Relates To: Dealership Actions. End-Payor Actions50 F. Supp. 3d 869
- Quadriga Art, Inc. v. Law Enforcement Alliance of America70 Va. Cir. 99
- Ashley Szymonek and Paul Szymonek v. Arturo Guzman and the Law Office of Art Guzman03-20-00569-CV
- Ashley Szymonek and Paul Szymonek v. Arturo Guzman and the Law Office of Art Guzman03-20-00569-CV
- Takafumi Horie v. the Law Offices of Art Dula, Arthur M. Dula, Individually and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, Anat Friedman, Indiividually and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, J. Buckner Hightower, the Robert A. and Virginia Heinlein Prize Trust560 S.W.3d 425
- In Re ART T., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ART T., Defendant and Appellant234 Cal. App. 4th 335
- James Prescott KNAPP v. ART.COM, INC.283 F. Supp. 3d 823
- in Re the Law Offices of Art Dula, Arthur, M. Dula, Individually, and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, Anat Friedman, Individually, and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, J. Buckner Hightower, and the Robert A. and Virginia Heinlein Prize Trust, Through14-15-00535-CV
- Sarah NOVIO v. The NEW YORK ACADEMY OF ART NYAA Holdings, LLC David Kratz Wade Schuman and Margaret Bowland317 F. Supp. 3d 803
- in Re the Law Offices of Art Dula, Arthur, M. Dula, Individually, and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, Anat Friedman, Individually, and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, J. Buckner Hightower, and the Robert A. and Virginia Heinlein Prize Trust, Through14-15-00535-CV
- in Re the Law Offices of Art Dula, Arthur, M. Dula, Individually, and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, Anat Friedman, Individually, and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, J. Buckner Hightower, and the Robert A. and Virginia Heinlein Prize Trust, Through14-15-00535-CV
- Sarah NOVIO v. The NEW YORK ACADEMY OF ART NYAA Holdings, LLC David Kratz Wade Schuman and Margaret Bowland286 F. Supp. 3d 566
- ART MIDWEST, INCORPORATED, a Nevada Corporation; American Realty Trust, Incorporated, a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. David M. CLAPPER; Atlantic Midwest, L.L.C., a Michigan Limited Liability Company; Atlantic XIII, L.L.C., a Michigan Limited Liability Company, Defendants-Appellees805 F.3d 611
- Rodolfo SANCHEZ; Kristopher Sleeman, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF AUSTIN, Defendant-Appellee774 F.3d 873
- In Re Art HARRIS, Relator315 S.W.3d 685
- Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala(1973) 4 SCC 225
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India(1978) 1 SCC 248
- State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar1952 AIR 75, 1952 SCR 284
- A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88
- Indra Sawhney v. Union of India1992 Supp (2) SCC 217
- Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan(1997) 6 SCC 241
- Shahid Raza v. State of Uttar Pradesh2023 INSC 106
- P.D. Gupta v. Ram Murti(1997) 11 SCC 524
- M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Ganga Pollution Case)(1988) 1 SCC 471
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India(1994) 3 SCC 1
- Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka(1992) 3 SCC 666
- Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P.(1994) 4 SCC 260
- Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi160 (2009) DLT 277
- S. Jagannath v. Union of India(1997) 2 SCC 87
- Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India(1990) 1 SCC 613
- L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India(1997) 3 SCC 261
- D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal(1997) 1 SCC 416
- M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath(2000) 6 SCC 213
- Kuldeep Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi(2006) 5 SCC 382
- People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (PUCL)(2004) 9 SCC 580
- State of M.P. v. Baldeo Prasad1961 AIR 293, 1961 SCR (1) 970
- R.K. Garg v. Union of India(1981) 4 SCC 675
- State of Rajasthan v. G. ChawlaAIR 1959 SC 544
- V. Ramamurthy v. State of Karnataka(1997) 2 SCC 642
- Devi Singh v. State of PunjabAIR 1966 SC 1727
- D.S. Gopal v. State of KarnatakaAIR 1970 SC 1710
- Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel(1985) 3 SCC 398
- Pratap Singh v. State of PunjabAIR 1964 SC 72
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India(1978) 1 SCC 248
- Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation(1985) 3 SCC 545
Exam Application
Apply south asian legal systems by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.