Scandinavian Law

Cases Applying This Concept

• Sierra Club v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District2 CA-CV 2023-0184
• JOSE LUIS MORALES Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. 22ND DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent1 Cal. App. 5th 504
• Curtis DAVIS, Movant-Appellee, v. PRODUCERS AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant762 F.3d 1276
• GERAWAN FARMING, INC., Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; United Farm Workers of America, Real Party in Interest.225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 517
• GERAWAN FARMING, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Et Al., Defendants and Respondents; LUPE GARCIA, Intervener and Appellant, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Et Al., Defendants and Respondents247 Cal. App. 4th 284
• COMMITTEE TO PROTECT OUR AGRICULTURAL WATER v. OCCIDENTAL OIL AND GAS CORPORATION235 F. Supp. 3d 1132
• Earline YOUNG v. INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 651 International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America General Motors, LLC686 F. App'x 304
• COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; Faye Krueger, in Her Official Capacity as Regional Forester for the U.S. Forest Service, Region One, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees789 F.3d 1075
• PROTECT AGRICULTURAL LAND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STANISLAUS COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent; CITY OF CERES, Real Party in Interest and Respondent223 Cal. App. 4th 550
• STATE of New Mexico EX REL. STATE ENGINEER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, v. Navajo Nation, Defendant/Intervenor-Appellee, v. San Juan Agricultural Water Users Association, Hammond Conservancy District, Bloomfield Irrigation District, and Various Ditches and Various Members Thereof, Defendants-Appellants.425 P.3d 723
• ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FOUNDATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEECH-NUT NUTRITION CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants and Appellants235 Cal. App. 4th 307
• INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW); James Ward; Marshall Hunt; Richard Gordon, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY; TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation; Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Defendants-Appellants854 F.3d 862
• SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Arizona and Headwaters Resources, Inc., a Utah corporation v. Reynold R. LEE Casey Watchman Woody Lee Peterson Yazzie Evelyn Meadows Herb Yazzie, Honorable Louise G. Grant, Honorable Eleanor Shirley, Honorable Leonard Thinn Sarah Gonnie672 F.3d 1176
• Anthony MINNIS v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE55 F. Supp. 3d 864
• In Re Arkansas Alternative Dispute Resolution Commission2026 Ark. 14
• In re REPORT OF THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES AND POLICY COMMITTEE ON SENIOR JUDGES AS MEDIATORS915 So. 2d 145
• In re PETITION OF THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES AND POLICY COMMITTEE ON AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFIED AND COURT-APPOINTED MEDIATORS969 So. 2d 1003
• In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure New Florida Rules For Court-Appointed Alternative Dispute Resolution NeutralsSC14-1852
• In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators 10.910220 So. 3d 408
• In Re: Amendments to the Code of Judicial Conduct - Senior Judges Serving as Voluntary Trial Resolution Judges and Arbitrators194 So. 3d 1015
• NJA 2005 s. 205 (Den danske model I)NJA 2005 s. 205
• UfR 2011.361 H (Børge Nielsen)UfR 2011.361 H
• Rt. 2012 s. 1556 (Fosnavåg-saken)Rt. 2012 s. 1556
• NJA 2007 s. 747 (Försäkringskassan-målet)NJA 2007 s. 747
• UfR 2005.236 H (Dansk Flygtningehjælp)UfR 2005.236 H
• Rt. 2014 s. 1056 (Telenor-saken)Rt. 2014 s. 1056
• NJA 2018 s. 521 (Moms på bursdag)NJA 2018 s. 521
• UfR 2013.283 H (Removal of child)UfR 2013.283 H
• Rt. 2008 s. 638 (Ottersen-saken)Rt. 2008 s. 638
• NJA 2009 s. 444 (Bodelningsavtal)NJA 2009 s. 444
• UfR 2007.1722 H (Entreprenørgaranti)UfR 2007.1722 H
• Rt. 2015 s. 1123 (Gulating lagmannsrett)Rt. 2015 s. 1123
• NJA 2016 s. 1 (Måste-tvånget)NJA 2016 s. 1
• UfR 2009.275 H (Fiskekvoter)UfR 2009.275 H
• Rt. 1997 s. 197 (Finanger I)Rt. 1997 s. 197
• NJA 2010 s. 253 (Kooperativa Förbundet)NJA 2010 s. 253
• UfR 2008.1619 H (Bilagssag)UfR 2008.1619 H
• Rt. 2011 s. 207 (Tønsberg tingrett)Rt. 2011 s. 207
• NJA 2014 s. 579 (Falun-saken)NJA 2014 s. 579
• UfR 2015.214 H (Brochmand)UfR 2015.214 H
• Rt. 2004 s. 169 (Rettslige skranker)Rt. 2004 s. 169
• NJA 2011 s. 105 (Lex Fyrverkeri)NJA 2011 s. 105
• UfR 2006.141 H (Fritagelse for leje)UfR 2006.141 H
• Rt. 2013 s. 1345 (Internasjonal rettergang)Rt. 2013 s. 1345
• NJA 2003 s. 42 (Kvittning)NJA 2003 s. 42
• UfR 2010.851 H (Ejendomsvurdering)UfR 2010.851 H
• Rt. 2010 s. 131 (Drammen tingrett)Rt. 2010 s. 131
• NJA 2008 s. 911 (Stockholms stadion)NJA 2008 s. 911
• UfR 2012.112 H (Mikkelborg-sagen)UfR 2012.112 H
• Rt. 2009 s. 257 (Voss tingrett)Rt. 2009 s. 257

Exam Application

Apply scandinavian law by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.