Restitution Law
restitution-law is a key legal principle explored in case law.
Cases Applying This Concept
- El Omari v. the International Criminal Police Organization35 F.4th 83
- AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA, Global Fund for Women, Global Rights, Human Rights Watch, International Criminal Defence Attorneys Association, the Nation Magazine, PEN American Center, Service Employees International Union, Washington Office on Latin America, Daniel N. Arshack, David Nevin, Scott McKay, Sylvia Royce, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James R. CLAPPER, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Director of National Intelligence,* Keith B. Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service, Eric H. Holder, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendants-Appellees638 F.3d 118
- People v. Law2024 NY Slip Op 05159
- SHERIDAN (QUASHAWN) v. STATE (CRIMINAL)567 P.3d 345
- SHERIDAN (QUASHAWN) v. STATE (CRIMINAL)141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 22
- Pazuniak Law Office, LLC v. Pi-Net International, Inc.N14C-12-259 EMD
- Pazuniak Law Office LLC v. Pi-Net International, Inc.N14C-12-259 EMD
- White v. FCW Law Offices352 Conn. 718
- Jordan Wood v. Criminal Records RepositoryWD85024
- ARESTY INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRM, P.C., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Defendant, Appellee677 F.3d 54
- Solimine v. International Law Students Assn.516 U.S. 856
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Law Offices of Peter T. NichollMisc. No. 2021-0151
- Jerry Choe v. Fordham University School of Law and Fordham International Law Journal81 F.3d 319
- Authority of the President Under Domestic and International Law to Use Military Force Against IraqOLC 2002-10-23
- Pazuniak Law Office LLC v. Pi-Net International, Inc.N14C-12-259 EMD
- Pazuniak Law Office LLC v. Pi-Net International, Inc.N14C-12-259 EMD
- The Constitutionality of Cooperative International Law Enforcement Activities Under the Emoluments ClauseOLC 1996-10-07
- Pazuniak Law Office, LLC v. Pi-Net International, Inc.N14C-12-259 EMD
- Pazuniak Law Office, LLC v. Pi-Net International, Inc.N14C-12-259 EMD
- Vermont Alliance of Nonprofit Organizations v. City of Burlington2004 VT 57
- Lipkin Gorman v. Karpnale Ltd.[1991] 2 AC 548
- Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v. Islington LBC[1996] AC 669
- Foskett v. McKeown[2001] 1 AC 102
- BP Exploration (Libya) Ltd v. Hunt (No 2)[1983] 2 AC 352
- Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v. Paul(1987) 162 CLR 221
- Lumbers v. W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (In liq)(2008) 232 CLR 635
- Roxborough v. Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd(2001) 208 CLR 516
- Moses v. Macferlan(1760) 2 Burr 1005
- Kelly v. Solari(1841) 9 M&W 54
- Cutter v. Powell(1795) 6 TR 320
- Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd[1943] AC 32
- Attorney General v. Blake[2001] 1 AC 268
- United Australia Ltd v. Barclays Bank Ltd[1941] AC 1
- Orakpo v. Manson Investments Ltd[1978] AC 95
- Equuscorp Pty Ltd v. Haxton(2012) 246 CLR 498
- Scott v. Scott(1963) 109 CLR 649
- Sempra Metals Ltd v. Inland Revenue Commissioners[2007] UKHL 34
- Commissioner of State Revenue v. Royal Insurance Australia Ltd(1994) 182 CLR 51
- David Securities Pty Ltd v. Commonwealth Bank of Australia(1992) 175 CLR 353
- Woolwich Equitable Building Society v. Inland Revenue Commissioners[1993] AC 70
- Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Duty to Inquire)[2023] UKSC 40
- Investment Trust Companies v. Revenue and Customs Commissioners[2017] UKSC 29
- Menelaou v. Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd[2015] UKSC 66
- Banque Financière de la Cité v. Parc (Battersea) Ltd[1999] 1 AC 221
- White v. FCW Law Offices352 Conn. 718
- Sheridan v. State (Criminal)567 P.3d 345
- El Omari v. International Criminal Police Organization35 F.4th 83
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Law Offices of Peter T. NichollMisc. No. 2021-0151
- Pazuniak Law Office LLC v. Pi-Net International Inc.N14C-12-259 EMD
- Jordan Wood v. Criminal Records RepositoryWD85024
Exam Application
Apply restitution law by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.