Reproductive Rights Law
reproductive-rights-law is a key legal principle explored in case law.
Cases Applying This Concept
- Matter of Marvin P. (Mid-Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Ctr.)222 A.D.3d 736
- Matter of Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Facility v. Sammy M.2021 NY Slip Op 06324
- BOARD OF FORENSIC DOCUMENT EXAMINERS, INC., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees.922 F.3d 827
- Ricardo Javier REY-CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. FORENSIC SCIENCE INSTITUTE (ICF), Et Al., Defendants794 F. Supp. 2d 329
- Matter of Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Facility v. Karmi K.W.179 N.Y.S.3d 653
- Tami ATWELL v. INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY FORENSIC SERVICES AGENCY168 F. Supp. 3d 1125
- Neelam UPPAL v. The HEALTH LAW FIRM246 So. 3d 1288
- Neelam UPPAL v. THE HEALTH LAW FIRM.138 S. Ct. 650
- American Health Law Association v. Estate of Fred Cunningham708 S.W.3d 863
- Uppal v. The Health Law Firm5D18-671
- Occupational Safety & Health Law Project, Pllc v. U.S. Department of LaborCivil Action No. 2021-2028
- Frank ZAMPOGNA, Appellee v. LAW ENFORCEMENT HEALTH BENEFITS, INC., Appellant151 A.3d 1003
- Zampogna, F. v. Law Enforcement Health, Aplt.40 EAP 2014
- Frank ZAMPOGNA, Respondent v. LAW ENFORCEMENT HEALTH BENEFITS, INC., Petitioner99 A.3d 531
- Zampogna, F. v. Law Enforcement Health, Aplt.40 EAP 2014
- Frank ZAMPOGNA v. LAW ENFORCEMENT HEALTH BENEFITS, INC.81 A.3d 1043
- Max MOUSSAZADEH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; Brad Livingston, Solely in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; David Sweeten, Solely in His Official Capacity as Warden of the Eastham Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Defendants-Appellees709 F.3d 487
- El Omari v. the International Criminal Police Organization35 F.4th 83
- AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA, Global Fund for Women, Global Rights, Human Rights Watch, International Criminal Defence Attorneys Association, the Nation Magazine, PEN American Center, Service Employees International Union, Washington Office on Latin America, Daniel N. Arshack, David Nevin, Scott McKay, Sylvia Royce, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James R. CLAPPER, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Director of National Intelligence,* Keith B. Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service, Eric H. Holder, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendants-Appellees638 F.3d 118
- People v. Law2024 NY Slip Op 05159
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization597 U.S. 215
- Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt579 U.S. 582
- June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo591 U.S. 299
- Gonzales v. Carhart550 U.S. 124
- Moyle v. United States603 U.S. ___ (2024)
- Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine602 U.S. 367 (2024)
- Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.587 U.S. ___ (2019)
- Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationNo. 22-5160 (D.C. Cir. 2024)
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey505 U.S. 833
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization597 U.S. 215
- Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt579 U.S. 582
- June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo591 U.S. 299
- Gonzales v. Carhart550 U.S. 124
- Moyle v. United States603 U.S. 324 (2024)
- Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine602 U.S. 367 (2024)
- Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.587 U.S. 345 (2019)
- Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationNo. 22-5160 (D.C. Cir. 2024)
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey947 F.2d 682 (3d Cir. 1991) (pre-Supreme Court)
- Harris v. McRae448 U.S. 297
- Maher v. Roe432 U.S. 464
- Bellotti v. Baird443 U.S. 622
- Hodgson v. Minnesota497 U.S. 417
- Stenberg v. Carhart530 U.S. 914
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services492 U.S. 490
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists476 U.S. 747
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth428 U.S. 52
- Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health462 U.S. 416
- Women's Health Center v. Texas Health and Human Services CommissionNo. 22-50669 (5th Cir. 2024)
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.573 U.S. 682 (2014)
- Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania591 U.S. 657 (2020)
Exam Application
Apply reproductive rights law by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.