Public International Law

Cases Applying This Concept

• Tena M. FOSTER v. PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. d/b/a Boomtown Belle Casino193 So. 3d 288
• Lee EDMISON Jr. and Rosemary Edmison v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, INC. d/b/a Harrah's New Orleans Casino and Schindler Elevator Corporation177 F. Supp. 3d 972
• Bryant MOORE v. LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT992 F. Supp. 2d 543
• PHOENIX ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS LLC v. Herbert J. BOYTE247 F. Supp. 3d 791
• Lee Oskar LEVITIN /p/k/a Lee Oskar, as an individual and d/b/a Ikke-Bad Music, Greg Errico, as an individual and d/b/a Radio Active Material Publishing Company and Keri Oskar, an individual v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America, a New York corporation Mr. 305, INC., a Florida corporation Polo Grounds Music, Inc., a New York corporation Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation Sony Music Entertainment UK, a British entity of unknown form Sony Music Entertainment Germany Gmbh, a German limited liability company Sony Music Entertainment Australia, Ltd., an Australian limited company Sony Music Entertainment Italy, S.P.A., an Italian corporation Sony Music Entertainment Mexico S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation Sony Music Entertainment España, S.L., a Spanish limited liability company Sony Music Entertainment Korea Inc., a South Korean corporation and Sony Music Entertainment France, a French: entity of unknown form101 F. Supp. 3d 376
• Bryant MOORE v. LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC. James Cameron Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation586 F. App'x 143
• Launa BULLOCK v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Bally's Atlantic City, and Caesars Entertaining Operating Company, Inc., d/b/a Bally's Atlantic City83 F. Supp. 3d 420
• COMMODORES ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. Thomas MCCLARY, Fifth Avenue Entertainment; LLC, Defendants-Counter Claimants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, David Fish, Et Al., Third Party Defendants879 F.3d 1114
• Mark LEYSE v. LIFETIME ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLC171 F. Supp. 3d 153
• Shannon CAMPBELL v. FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Defendants Mark Ennis v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.75 F. Supp. 3d 1193
• Russ MCCULLOUGH, Ryan Sakoda, and Matthew Robert Wiese, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated; William Albert Haynes, III, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INCORPORATED, Movant-Defendant-Appellee838 F.3d 210
• Michael Fernando Sierra MIRANDA, Appellant, v. PACHECO ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC., Etc., Appellee220 So. 3d 523
• SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant v. John COYNE d/b/a Extreme Karaoke and Absolute Disc Jockeys, Allen Mando, Rachel Yackley, Peter Garcia, and Kenny Seidman d/b/a DJ Kenny B, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs141 F. Supp. 3d 813
• Ellen Newlin CHASE and Margaret Chase Perry v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC. Warner Bros. Consumer Products, Inc. Warner-Olive Music LLC Warner Bros. Home Entertainment, Inc. Chuck Lorre Productions, Inc., CBS Corporation CBS Consumer Products, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. Fox Broadcasting Company Fox Television Stations, Inc. Ripple Junction Design Co. and Willis Music Company247 F. Supp. 3d 421
• Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Ron Edwards86 F.4th 1255
• Environmental Law Foundation v. State Water Resources Control Bd.C093513M
• Environmental Law Foundation v. State Water Resources Control Bd.C093513
• Environmental Law Foundation v. Beech-NutA139821M
• Environmental Law Foundation v. State Water Resources Control Bd.C083239
• ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FOUNDATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEECH-NUT NUTRITION CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants and Appellants235 Cal. App. 4th 307
• North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands)ICJ Rep 1969, p. 3
• Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America)ICJ Rep 1986, p. 14
• Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić (Appeal on Jurisdiction)IT-94-1-AR72, Appeals Chamber Decision of 2 October 1995
• The Paquete Habana175 U.S. 677
• Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)ICJ Rep 2002, p. 3
• Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia)ICJ Rep 1997, p. 7
• Jus Cogens / Peremptory Norm Cases: Prosecutor v. FurundžijaIT-95-17/1-T, Trial Chamber Judgment of 10 December 1998
• Loizidou v. Turkey (Preliminary Objections)23 EHRR 513, Application no. 15318/89
• Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United NationsICJ Rep 1949, p. 174
• SS Lotus (France v. Turkey)PCIJ Rep Series A No 10
• Kadic v. Karadzic70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995)
• Case Concerning the Island of Palmas (Netherlands v. USA)2 RIAA 829 (1928)
• Advisory Opinion on Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian TerritoryICJ Rep 2004, p. 136
• The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul AkayesuICTR-96-4-T, Trial Chamber Judgment of 2 September 1998
• Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain)ICJ Rep 1970, p. 3
• R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind[1991] 1 AC 696
• North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands)ICJ Rep 1969, p. 3
• Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America)ICJ Rep 1986, p. 14
• Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić (Appeal on Jurisdiction)IT-94-1-AR72, Appeals Chamber Decision of 2 October 1995
• The Paquete Habana175 U.S. 677
• Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)ICJ Rep 2002, p. 3
• Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia)ICJ Rep 1997, p. 7
• Prosecutor v. FurundžijaIT-95-17/1-T, Trial Chamber Judgment of 10 December 1998
• Loizidou v. Turkey (Preliminary Objections)23 EHRR 513, Application no. 15318/89
• Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United NationsICJ Rep 1949, p. 174
• SS Lotus (France v. Turkey)PCIJ Rep Series A No 10
• Kadic v. Karadzic70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995)
• Case Concerning the Island of Palmas (Netherlands v. USA)2 RIAA 829 (1928)
• Advisory Opinion on Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian TerritoryICJ Rep 2004, p. 136
• The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul AkayesuICTR-96-4-T, Trial Chamber Judgment of 2 September 1998

Exam Application

Apply public international law by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.