Post Colonial Legal Systems

Cases Applying This Concept

• Martin v. THI E-Commerce, LLCG061234
• Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.172 Cal. App. 4th 488
• A. E. STALEY MANUFACTURING COMPANY Et Al., as the Industrial Energy Consumers (IIEC), Petitioners, v. THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Et Al., Respondents519 N.E.2d 1130
• Charles E. Cunningham v. Tennessee Department of Commerce And Insurance, Insurance DivisionM2016-02231-COA-R3-CV
• White v. FCW Law Offices352 Conn. 718
• E. QUALCOM CORP., a Florida corporation v. GLOBAL COMMERCE CENTER ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida non-profit corporation59 So. 3d 347
• N.E. Physical Therapy Plus, Inc. v. Commerce Insurance Company2009 Mass. App. Div. 223
• Transgender Law Center v. Ice46 F.4th 771
• Transgender Law Center v. Ice20-17416
• United States v. Rita Law990 F.3d 1058
• John Deaton and Deaton Law Firm, LLC v. Law Offices of Steven M. Johnson, PC11-23-00126-CV
• Friedman v. Division of Administrative Law AppealsAC 23-P-369
• Conservation Law Foundation v. RossCivil Action No. 2018-1087
• EDUCATION LAW CENTER ON BEHALF OF ABBOTT V. BURKE SCHOOLCHILDREN v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION AND CHRISTOPHER D. CERF, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION438 N.J. Super. 108
• EDUCATION LAW CENTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-MOVANT194 N.J. 258
• EDUCATION LAW CENTER, ON BEHALF OF ABBOTT V. BURKE CHILDREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION198 N.J. 274
• EDUCATION LAW CENTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-MOVANT192 N.J. 64
• Education Law Center v. New Jersey Department of Education944 A.2d 22
• EDUCATION LAW CENTER, ON BEHALF OF ABBOTT V. BURKE, CHILDREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION396 N.J. Super. 634
• Education Law Center on Behalf of Abbott v. Burke schoolchildren v. New Jersey State Board of Education and Christopher D. Cerf, Commissioner, New Jersey DepartmentA-2816-12
• Southern Rhodesia (Re)[1919] AC 211
• Mabo v Queensland (No 2)(1992) 175 CLR 1
• Delgamuukw v British Columbia[1997] 3 SCR 1010
• Ngati Apa v Attorney-General[2003] 3 NZLR 643
• Amodu Tijani v Secretary, Southern Nigeria[1921] 2 AC 399
• Worcester v Georgia31 US (6 Pet) 515 (1832)
• United States v Kagama118 US 375 (1886)
• Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria(2002) 214 CLR 422
• Calder v British Columbia (AG)[1973] SCR 313
• Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia[2014] 2 SCR 257
• Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community v Paraguay2006 Inter-Am Ct HR (Ser C) No 146
• The State v DossoPLD 1958 SC 180
• Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke[1968] UKPC 18
• Pratt v Morgan[1989] 3 All ER 755
• S v Makwanyane(1995) 6 BCLR 665 (CC)
• Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha(2004) 3 SA 1 (CC)
• Epuru Sudhakar v Government of Andhra Pradesh(2006) 6 SCC 560
• Niyonzima v Mutaganzwa[2009] 1 EA 64 (SCA)
• R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2)[2008] UKHL 61
• Hoffmann v South African Airways(2001) 1 SA 1 (CC)
• O'Donnell v Commonwealth(1988) 166 CLR 50
• The State v Ncube1990 (1) ZLR 127 (S)
• A-G v Taylor[1975] 1 NZLR 543
• Nguyen v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)[2002] 3 FC 394 (CA)
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Quaqua[2000] UKHL 12
• United States v Sioux Nation of Indians448 US 371 (1980)
• Forsyth v Commissioner of Inland Revenue[1997] 3 NZLR 481
• R v Symonds(1847) NZPCC 387
• Advisory Opinion on Western Sahara[1975] ICJ Rep 12
• Ochberg v Commissioner of Patents[1975] 3 SA 193 (A)

Exam Application

Apply post colonial legal systems by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.