National Security Law
national-security-law is a key legal principle explored in case law.
Cases Applying This Concept
- Christian Heritage v. Oklahoma Secondary04-6342
- Michael Green, Max Rasansky, the Board of Trustees of Congregation Emanu-El B'ne Jeshurun, and Congregation Emanu-El B'ne Jeshurun, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Respondent2002 WI App 297
- IN THE MATTER OF ATTORNEY GENERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE NOS. 2020-5 AND 2020-6 (DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY) (CONSOLIDATED)A-3950-19T4/A-3975-19T4/A-3985-19T4/A-3987-19T4/A-4002-19T4
- IN THE MATTER OF ATTORNEY GENERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE NOS. 2020-5 AND 2020-6 (DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY) (CONSOLIDATED)A-3950-19T4/A-3975-19T4/A-3985-19T4/A-3987-19T4/A-4002-19T4
- UPHOLD OUR HERITAGE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TOWN OF WOODSIDE, Defendant and Appellant; STEVEN JOBS, Real Party in Interest and Appellant54 Cal. Rptr. 3d 366
- Demetric M. Mercadel and Michael G. Bagneris v. New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival and Foundation, Inc.2022-C-0242
- ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE ASSOCIATION Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MONTEREY Et Al., Defendants and Respondents19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 469
- INDO-AMERICAN CULTURAL SOCIETY, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, NEW JERSEY930 F. Supp. 1062
- Martin v. Heritage Manor South784 So. 2d 627
- HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT Ralph Fertig Ilankai Thamil Sangam Tamils of Northern California Tamil Welfare and Human Rights Committee Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America World Tamil Coordinating Committee Nagalingam Jeyalingam v. Janet RENO, as Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice Madeleine K. Albright, as United States Secretary of State United States Department of State, Defendants-Appellees Humanitarian Law Project Ralph Fertig Ilankai Thamil Sangam Tamils of Northern California Tamil Welfare and Human Rights Committee Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America World Tamil Coordinating Committee Nagalingam Jeyalingam v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice Madeleine K. Albright, as United States Secretary of State United States Department of State205 F.3d 1130
- Mickens v. Fisher Phillips Law Firm2024 Ohio 2216
- Lyons v. Birmingham Law Office, LLCAC45631, AC45632
- BRANSON'S NANTUCKET, LLC v. TIMESHARE LAW OFFICE, LLC; NEALLY LAW, LLC, JOHSUA DAVID NEALLY; AND JENNIFER HARDYSD38350
- Newman v. Howard University School of LawCivil Action No. 2023-0436
- Burri Law Pa v. William Skurla35 F.4th 1207
- Valve Corporation, V. Bucher Law, Pllc Et Ano86585-4
- Patricia J. Curto v. New York Law Journal144 A.D.3d 1543
- Patricia J. Curto v. New York Law Journal144 A.D.3d 1543
- Newman v. Howard University School of LawCivil Action No. 2023-0436
- Newman v. Howard University School of LawCivil Action No. 2023-0436
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.299 U.S. 304
- Korematsu v. United States323 U.S. 214
- Ex parte Quirin317 U.S. 1
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld542 U.S. 507
- Rasul v. Bush542 U.S. 466
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld548 U.S. 557
- Boumediene v. Bush553 U.S. 723
- Trump v. Hawaii585 U.S. 667
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project561 U.S. 1
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USA568 U.S. 398
- New York Times Co. v. United States403 U.S. 713
- United States v. United States District Court (Keith)407 U.S. 297
- Rumsfeld v. Padilla542 U.S. 426
- Munaf v. Geren553 U.S. 674
- Al-Marri v. Spagone555 U.S. 1220
- Ludecke v. Watkins335 U.S. 160
- Johnson v. Eisentrager339 U.S. 763
- Reid v. Covert354 U.S. 1
- United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez494 U.S. 259
- United States v. Bin Laden92 F. Supp. 2d 225
- CIA v. Sims471 U.S. 159
- Department of the Navy v. Egan484 U.S. 518
- Haig v. Agee453 U.S. 280
- Snepp v. United States444 U.S. 507
- Zadvydas v. Davis533 U.S. 678
- INS v. Chadha462 U.S. 919
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer343 U.S. 579
- Dames & Moore v. Regan453 U.S. 654
- United States v. Flores-Montano541 U.S. 149
- United States v. Padilla389 F.3d 234
Exam Application
Apply national security law by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.