Franchise Law
franchise-law is a key legal principle explored in case law.
Cases Applying This Concept
- Barber v. D.C. Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges19-CV-266, 19-CV-670 & 19-CV-1242
- Exxon Mobil Global Services v. State Office of Administrative Hearings, and Keneshia Washington in Her Official Capacity as Administrative Law Judge15-24-00034-CV
- Exxon Mobil Global Services v. State Office of Administrative Hearings, and Keneshia Washington in Her Official Capacity as Administrative Law Judge15-24-00034-CV
- Exxon Mobil Global Services v. State Office of Administrative Hearings, and Keneshia Washington in Her Official Capacity as Administrative Law Judge15-24-00034-CV
- James J. DONELON, Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOUISIANA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, Through Its Director, Ann WISE, Defendant-Appellee522 F.3d 564
- New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission v. Joseph Divincenzo and Jorge Martinez (Office of Administrative Law)445 N.J. Super. 187
- Association of Administrative Law Judges, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Afl-Cio v. Federal Service Impasses PanelCivil Action No. 2020-1026
- Caryn Hines & Claudia Barber v. DC Commission on Selection & Tenure of Administrative Law Judges of the Office of Administrative Hearings16-AA-735 & 16-AA-867
- CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, AND HEARING OFFICERS IN STATE EMPLOYMENT, and v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., as Governor, etc., Cross-defendants and Appellants JAN FRANK, Cross-complainant and Respondent JOHN CHIANG, as Controller, etc., and195 Cal. App. 4th 119
- ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Et Al., Defendants640 F. Supp. 2d 66
- Association of Administrative Law Judges v. United States Office of Personnel ManagementCivil Action No. 2007-0711
- ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY365 U.S. App. D.C. 6
- ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Et Al., Defendants533 F. Supp. 2d 155
- The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a and the Louisiana Board of Ethics2023-CA-00398
- In re SOUTH AFRICAN APARTHEID LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Lungisile Ntsebeza v. Ford Motor Company, and International Business Machines Corporation, Defendants Sakewe Balintulo v. Ford Motor Company, and International Machines Corporation15 F. Supp. 3d 454
- In re SOUTH AFRICAN APARTHEID LITIGATION56 F. Supp. 3d 331
- Bethesda African Cemetery Coal. v. Housing Opp. Comm.18/23
- In Re SOUTH AFRICAN APARTHEID LITIGATION633 F. Supp. 2d 117
- In Re South African Apartheid Litigation624 F. Supp. 2d 336
- In Re South African Apartheid Litigation643 F. Supp. 2d 423
- PREISS v. WINE AND DESIGN FRANCHISE, LLC821 S.E.2d 440
- Ronald D. MASS, and v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, and251 Cal. Rptr. 3d 279
- Lakeway Real Estate2, LLC v. ERA Franchise Systems, LLCE2023-00764-COA-R3-CV
- Emily N. PREISS and Wine and Design, LLC v. WINE AND DESIGN FRANCHISE, LLC; Harriet E. Mills; Patrick Mills ; And Capital Sign Solutions, LLC824 S.E.2d 850
- Chamora IVERY, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. RMH FRANCHISE CORP., RMH Illinois, LLC, and RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc.280 F. Supp. 3d 1121
- FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner v. Gilbert P. HYATT587 U.S. 230
- Donald BURRELL v. 911 RESTORATION FRANCHISE, INC.294 F. Supp. 3d 436
- Cheri MARCHIONDA v. EMBASSY SUITES FRANCHISE, LLC, dba Hilton Franchise Holding, LLC Hilton Worldwide, Inc. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. John Q. Hammons Hotels Management, LLC Atrium TRS III, LP and John Doe Corporations 1-10359 F. Supp. 3d 681
- Barbara IRWIN, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. JIMMY JOHN'S FRANCHISE, LLC, Jimmy John's Enterprises, LLC a/k/a Jimmy John's LLC175 F. Supp. 3d 1064
- Sherry BROWN and Ericka Newby, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. RITA'S WATER ICE FRANCHISE COMPANY LLC242 F. Supp. 3d 356
- Sylas BUTLER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. JIMMY JOHN'S FRANCHISE, LLC331 F. Supp. 3d 786
- Vicken O. BERJIKIAN and Enna Berjikian v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Department of Motor Vehicles Board of Pharmacy93 F. Supp. 3d 1151
- BUNZL DISTRIBUTION USA, INC., and v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, and238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 645
- The GILLETTE COMPANY Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent. [And Five Other Cases.]62 Cal. 4th 468
- YUMILICIOUS FRANCHISE, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellee v. Matthew BARRIE; Kelly Glynn; Why Not, L.L.C.; Brian Glynn, Defendants-Appellants819 F.3d 170
- INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION, INC.; Charles Stempler; Katherine Lyons; Mark Lyons; Michael Park; Ronald Oh, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, a Municipal Corporation; Fred Podesta, Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, Defendants-Appellees803 F.3d 389
- DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent53 Cal. 4th 1227
- BAYARD M. ORDLOCK Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent135 P.3d 628
- BOTTLE POETRY, LLC, Uncorked, LLC d/b/a The Wine Loft Uncorked II, LLC d/b/a The Wine Loft, DP Ventures, and the Wine Loft Pittsburgh, Inc. v. DOYLE RESTAURANT GROUP FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC133 So. 3d 60
- Michelle RIVAS and Thomas Kaschak, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Et Al., Defendants619 F. Supp. 2d 994
- ALEX BATES Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Et Al., Defendants and Respondents21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 285
- CPR-CELL PHONE REPAIR FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. Nariman NAYRAMI896 F. Supp. 2d 1233
- ROBERT E. MILHOUS Et Al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Appellant32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 640
- GUIFU LI, Meng Wang, Fang Dai, Lin Cui, and Zhong Yu, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. A PERFECT DAY FRANCHISE, INC., a California Corporation281 F.R.D. 373
- William M. HAWKINS, III, AKA Trip Hawkins, Appellant, v. the FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA; United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Appellees769 F.3d 662
- In Re William M. HAWKINS, III, AKA Trip Hawkins; And Lisa Warnes Hawkins, AKA Lisa A. Hawkins, Debtors. William M. Hawkins, III, and Lisa Warnes Hawkins, Plaintiffs, v. the Franchise Tax Board, a Division of the Government of the State of California; And the United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Defendants430 B.R. 225
- GUIFU LI, Meng Wang, Fang Dai, Lin Cui, and Zhong Yu, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. A PERFECT DAY FRANCHISE, INC., a California Corporation270 F.R.D. 509
- PETROLEUM & FRANCHISE FUNDING LLC, Appellant, v. BULK PETROLEUM CORP., Convenience Stores Leasing & Management LLC, and Unsecured Creditors Committee, Appellees435 B.R. 589
- Dale Mears v. Zeppe's Franchise Development2009 Ohio 27
- In Re Brenda Marie JONES, Debtor. California Franchise Tax Board, Appellant, v. Brenda Marie Jones; John T. Kendall, Trustee; United States Trustee, Oakland, Appellees420 B.R. 506
Exam Application
Apply franchise law by identifying the relevant facts, citing the leading case, and explaining the ratio.