David EBELING and Robert A. Ebeling v. SUNTRUST BANK, a Georgia Banking Corporation, AS TRUSTEE OF the RICHARD W. KOHLER TRUST John Chambers, as personal representative of the Estate of Jean M. Kohler Mueller Richard D. Jensen Daniel R. Jensen E. Wesley Barker Rebecca G. Ebeling Peter M. Ebeling Billy W. Rodgers Cherie Lynn Christensen Steven D. Rodgers Sheila E. Rodgers Ashley G. Rodgers Brady Joe Davis Joshuah Paul Davis Sara Nienader Frederick Carrington, as guardian ad litem for unknown and unborn who may have an interest in this litigation, John Chambers, as personal representative of the Estate of Jean M. Kohler Mueller v. SunTrust Bank, a Georgia Banking Corporation, as trustee of the Richard W. Kohler Trust Richard D. Jensen Daniel R. Jensen E. Wesley Barker Rebecca G. Ebeling Peter M. Ebeling Billy W. Christensen Steven D. Rodgers Cherie Lynn Rodgers Sheila E. Rodgers Ashley G. Rodgers Brady Joe Davis Joshuah Paul Davis Sara Nienader Frederick Carrington, as guardian ad litem for unknown and unborn who may have an interest in this litigation [2019]

How might David EBELING and Robert A. Ebeling v. SUNTRUST BANK, a Georgia Banking Corporation, AS TRUSTEE OF the RICHARD W. KOHLER TRUST John Chambers, as personal representative of the Estate of Jean M. Kohler Mueller Richard D. Jensen Daniel R. Jensen E. Wesley Barker Rebecca G. Ebeling Peter M. Ebeling Billy W. Rodgers Cherie Lynn Christensen Steven D. Rodgers Sheila E. Rodgers Ashley G. Rodgers Brady Joe Davis Joshuah Paul Davis Sara Nienader Frederick Carrington, as guardian ad litem for unknown and unborn who may have an interest in this litigation, John Chambers, as personal representative of the Estate of Jean M. Kohler Mueller v. SunTrust Bank, a Georgia Banking Corporation, as trustee of the Richard W. Kohler Trust Richard D. Jensen Daniel R. Jensen E. Wesley Barker Rebecca G. Ebeling Peter M. Ebeling Billy W. Christensen Steven D. Rodgers Cherie Lynn Rodgers Sheila E. Rodgers Ashley G. Rodgers Brady Joe Davis Joshuah Paul Davis Sara Nienader Frederick Carrington, as guardian ad litem for unknown and unborn who may have an interest in this litigation help a student research, compare, or distinguish an issue in Tax Law, and what must be verified in the linked source before citation?

How might David EBELING and Robert A. Ebeling v. SUNTRUST BANK, a Georgia Banking Corporation, AS TRUSTEE OF the RICHARD W. KOHLER TRUST John Chambers, as personal representative of the Estate of Jean M. Kohler Mueller Richard D. Jensen Daniel R. Jensen E. Wesley Barker Rebecca G. Ebeling Peter M. Ebeling Billy W. Rodgers Cherie Lynn Christensen Steven D. Rodgers Sheila E. Rodgers Ashley G. Rodgers Brady Joe Davis Joshuah Paul Davis Sara Nienader Frederick Carrington, as guardian ad litem for unknown and unborn who may have an interest in this litigation, John Chambers, as personal representative of the Estate of Jean M. Kohler Mueller v. SunTrust Bank, a Georgia Banking Corporation, as trustee of the Richard W. Kohler Trust Richard D. Jensen Daniel R. Jensen E. Wesley Barker Rebecca G. Ebeling Peter M. Ebeling Billy W. Christensen Steven D. Rodgers Cherie Lynn Rodgers Sheila E. Rodgers Ashley G. Rodgers Brady Joe Davis Joshuah Paul Davis Sara Nienader Frederick Carrington, as guardian ad litem for unknown and unborn who may have an interest in this litigation help a student research, compare, or distinguish an issue in Tax Law, and what must be verified in the linked source before citation?

Source-linked holding checkpoint: verify the dispositive holding in the linked source. This entry intentionally avoids inventing a rule that may not belong to Tax Law.

Extract the ratio from the linked judgment by identifying the legal test, material facts, and reason for the outcome. Treat this record as a research lead unless the source confirms a direct Tax Law rule.

• tax-law
• Tax Law
• case research
• source verification
• exam authority table

No related cases listed.

• Name the issue before discussing facts so the marker sees the legal question immediately.
• State the holding in one sentence, then use the ratio to explain why the court reached that result.
• Use the citation and jurisdiction to show why this authority matters for the problem you are answering.
• Pair this case with one supporting or contrasting authority if the question tests limits, policy, or exceptions.