Raffles v. Wichelhaus [1864]

2 H. & C. 906, 159 Eng. Rep. 375 (Ex. 1864) · Court of Exchequer · England and Wales

Summary

Classic latent ambiguity and mutual assent case.

Facts

A cotton contract referred to a ship named Peerless, but two ships with that name sailed at different times.

Issue

Was there mutual assent when the parties meant different ships?

Held

No enforceable contract was found on the pleaded ambiguity.

Ratio Decidendi

Mutual misunderstanding about a material term can prevent contract formation.

Reasoning

Material latent ambiguity prevented a meeting of the minds.

Significance

Classic latent ambiguity and mutual assent case.

Related Cases

No related cases listed.

Exam Tips

Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.

Sources