Amanda E. HOLT, Elaine Tomlin, Louis Nudi, Diane Edbril, Dariel I. Jamieson, Lora Lavin, James Yoest, Jeffrey Meyer, Christopher H. Fromme, Timothy F. Burnett, Chris Hertzog, Glen Eckhart, and Mary Frances Ballard v. 2011 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION, Appellee Senator Jay Costa, Senator Lawrence M. Farnese, Jr., Senator Christine M. Tartaglione, Senator Shirley M. Kitchen, Senator Leanna M. Washington, Senator Michael J. Stack, Senator Vincent J. Hughes, Senator Anthony H. Williams, Senator Judith L. Schwank, Senator John T. Yudichak, Senator Daylin Leach, Senator Lisa M. Boscola, Senator Andrew E. Dinniman, Senator John P. Blake, Senator Richard A. Kasunic, Senator John N. Wozniak, Senator Jim Ferlo, Senator Wayne D. Fontana, Senator James R. Brewster, and Senator Timothy J. Solobay v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Mayor Carolyn Comitta, Council President Holly Brown, William J. Scott, Jr., Herbert A. Schwabe, II, Jane Heald Close, Floyd Robert Bielski, David Laleike, E. Brian Abbott, Nathaniel Smith, and W. Donald Braceland v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Mayor Leo Scoda and Council Person Jennifer Mayo v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Thomas Schiffer, Alison Bausman, Rachel J. Amdur, Joan Tarka, Lawrence W. Abel, Margaret G. Morscheck, Lawrence J. Chrzan, Julia Schultz and Shirley Resnick v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Sekela Coles, Cynthia Jackson and Lee Taliaferro v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Patty Kim v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Edward J. Bradley, Jr., Patrick McKenna, Jr., Dorothy Gallagher, Richard H. Lowe, and John F. "Jack" Byrne v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Dennis J. Baylor v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Andrew Dominick Alosi v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Carlos A. Zayas v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee William C. Kortz, Michelle L. Vezzani, Michael E. Cherepko, Gregory Erosenko, Joyce Popovich, John Bevec, Lisa Bashioum, and Richard Christopher v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission [2012]
38 A.3d 711 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jurisdiction from source
Issue
What Legislative Drafting issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion?
Held
Source-linked holding checkpoint: the search record does not safely provide the full dispositive holding. Confirm the judgment in the linked source before using this case as controlling authority.
Exam use
Summary
What Legislative Drafting issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion?
Facts
Issue
What Legislative Drafting issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion?
Held
Source-linked holding checkpoint: the search record does not safely provide the full dispositive holding. Confirm the judgment in the linked source before using this case as controlling authority.
Ratio Decidendi
Use this case as a source-verified research checkpoint rather than an invented rule statement. The ratio should be extracted from the linked opinion by identifying the legal test applied, the facts treated as decisive, and the court's stated reason for the outcome.
Reasoning
Essay-Ready Explanation Generator
Version 1 of 4
Reference to Amanda E. HOLT, Elaine Tomlin, Louis Nudi, Diane Edbril, Dariel I. Jamieson, Lora Lavin, James Yoest, Jeffrey Meyer, Christopher H. Fromme, Timothy F. Burnett, Chris Hertzog, Glen Eckhart, and Mary Frances Ballard v. 2011 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION, Appellee Senator Jay Costa, Senator Lawrence M. Farnese, Jr., Senator Christine M. Tartaglione, Senator Shirley M. Kitchen, Senator Leanna M. Washington, Senator Michael J. Stack, Senator Vincent J. Hughes, Senator Anthony H. Williams, Senator Judith L. Schwank, Senator John T. Yudichak, Senator Daylin Leach, Senator Lisa M. Boscola, Senator Andrew E. Dinniman, Senator John P. Blake, Senator Richard A. Kasunic, Senator John N. Wozniak, Senator Jim Ferlo, Senator Wayne D. Fontana, Senator James R. Brewster, and Senator Timothy J. Solobay v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Mayor Carolyn Comitta, Council President Holly Brown, William J. Scott, Jr., Herbert A. Schwabe, II, Jane Heald Close, Floyd Robert Bielski, David Laleike, E. Brian Abbott, Nathaniel Smith, and W. Donald Braceland v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Mayor Leo Scoda and Council Person Jennifer Mayo v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Thomas Schiffer, Alison Bausman, Rachel J. Amdur, Joan Tarka, Lawrence W. Abel, Margaret G. Morscheck, Lawrence J. Chrzan, Julia Schultz and Shirley Resnick v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Sekela Coles, Cynthia Jackson and Lee Taliaferro v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Patty Kim v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Edward J. Bradley, Jr., Patrick McKenna, Jr., Dorothy Gallagher, Richard H. Lowe, and John F. "Jack" Byrne v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Dennis J. Baylor v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Andrew Dominick Alosi v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee Carlos A. Zayas v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Appellee William C. Kortz, Michelle L. Vezzani, Michael E. Cherepko, Gregory Erosenko, Joyce Popovich, John Bevec, Lisa Bashioum, and Richard Christopher v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission (38 A.3d 711) strengthens a Legislative Drafting answer because the case reflects the principle that Use this case as a source-verified research checkpoint rather than an invented rule statement. The ratio should be extracted from the linked opinion by identifying the legal test applied, the facts treated as decisive, and the court's stated reason for the outcome. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as What Legislative Drafting issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.
Underlying Concepts
- legislative-drafting
- Legislative Drafting
- source verification
- case research
- exam authority table
Significance
Related Cases
No related cases listed.
Exam Tips
Revision Checklist
- Name the issue before discussing facts so the marker sees the legal question immediately.
- State the holding in one sentence, then use the ratio to explain why the court reached that result.
- Use the citation and jurisdiction to show why this authority matters for the problem you are answering.
- Pair this case with one supporting or contrasting authority if the question tests limits, policy, or exceptions.