Lee Oskar LEVITIN /p/k/a Lee Oskar, as an individual and d/b/a Ikke-Bad Music, Greg Errico, as an individual and d/b/a Radio Active Material Publishing Company and Keri Oskar, an individual v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America, a New York corporation Mr. 305, INC., a Florida corporation Polo Grounds Music, Inc., a New York corporation Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation Sony Music Entertainment UK, a British entity of unknown form Sony Music Entertainment Germany Gmbh, a German limited liability company Sony Music Entertainment Australia, Ltd., an Australian limited company Sony Music Entertainment Italy, S.P.A., an Italian corporation Sony Music Entertainment Mexico S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation Sony Music Entertainment España, S.L., a Spanish limited liability company Sony Music Entertainment Korea Inc., a South Korean corporation and Sony Music Entertainment France, a French: entity of unknown form [2015]

How might Lee Oskar LEVITIN /p/k/a Lee Oskar, as an individual and d/b/a Ikke-Bad Music, Greg Errico, as an individual and d/b/a Radio Active Material Publishing Company and Keri Oskar, an individual v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America, a New York corporation Mr. 305, INC., a Florida corporation Polo Grounds Music, Inc., a New York corporation Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation Sony Music Entertainment UK, a British entity of unknown form Sony Music Entertainment Germany Gmbh, a German limited liability company Sony Music Entertainment Australia, Ltd., an Australian limited company Sony Music Entertainment Italy, S.P.A., an Italian corporation Sony Music Entertainment Mexico S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation Sony Music Entertainment España, S.L., a Spanish limited liability company Sony Music Entertainment Korea Inc., a South Korean corporation and Sony Music Entertainment France, a French: entity of unknown form help a student research, compare, or distinguish an issue in Family Law, and what must be verified in the linked source before citation?

How might Lee Oskar LEVITIN /p/k/a Lee Oskar, as an individual and d/b/a Ikke-Bad Music, Greg Errico, as an individual and d/b/a Radio Active Material Publishing Company and Keri Oskar, an individual v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America, a New York corporation Mr. 305, INC., a Florida corporation Polo Grounds Music, Inc., a New York corporation Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation Sony Music Entertainment UK, a British entity of unknown form Sony Music Entertainment Germany Gmbh, a German limited liability company Sony Music Entertainment Australia, Ltd., an Australian limited company Sony Music Entertainment Italy, S.P.A., an Italian corporation Sony Music Entertainment Mexico S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation Sony Music Entertainment España, S.L., a Spanish limited liability company Sony Music Entertainment Korea Inc., a South Korean corporation and Sony Music Entertainment France, a French: entity of unknown form help a student research, compare, or distinguish an issue in Family Law, and what must be verified in the linked source before citation?

Source-linked holding checkpoint: verify the dispositive holding in the linked source. This entry intentionally avoids inventing a rule that may not belong to Family Law.

Extract the ratio from the linked judgment by identifying the legal test, material facts, and reason for the outcome. Treat this record as a research lead unless the source confirms a direct Family Law rule.

• family-law
• Family Law
• case research
• source verification
• exam authority table

No related cases listed.

• Name the issue before discussing facts so the marker sees the legal question immediately.
• State the holding in one sentence, then use the ratio to explain why the court reached that result.
• Use the citation and jurisdiction to show why this authority matters for the problem you are answering.
• Pair this case with one supporting or contrasting authority if the question tests limits, policy, or exceptions.