COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, a Colorado Non-Profit Corporation; Anita Hansen; Julie Farrar, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Benjamin Hernandez; Robert Sirowitz; Joshua Stapen; Robin Stephens, Plaintiffs, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.; Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.; J.M. Hollister LLC, D/B/A Hollister Co., Defendants-Appellants. United States of America; Legal Center for People With Disabilities and Older People; American Association of People With Disabilities; Center for Rights of Parents With Disabilities; Disability Rights and Advocates; Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund; Disability Rights Legal Center; Legal Aid Society-Employment Law Center; National Disability Rights Network; National Federation of the Blind, Amici Curiae [2014]

Version 1 of 4

Reference to COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, a Colorado Non-Profit Corporation; Anita Hansen; Julie Farrar, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Benjamin Hernandez; Robert Sirowitz; Joshua Stapen; Robin Stephens, Plaintiffs, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.; Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.; J.M. Hollister LLC, D/B/A Hollister Co., Defendants-Appellants. United States of America; Legal Center for People With Disabilities and Older People; American Association of People With Disabilities; Center for Rights of Parents With Disabilities; Disability Rights and Advocates; Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund; Disability Rights Legal Center; Legal Aid Society-Employment Law Center; National Disability Rights Network; National Federation of the Blind, Amici Curiae (765 F.3d 1205) strengthens a Disability Rights Law answer because the case reflects the principle that Use this case as a source-verified research checkpoint rather than an invented rule statement. The ratio should be extracted from the linked opinion by identifying the legal test applied, the facts treated as decisive, and the court's stated reason for the outcome. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as What Disability Rights Law issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.