Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [1993]

509 U.S. 579 (1993) · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

Summary

Core evidence case for expert admissibility.

Facts

Plaintiffs offered expert testimony about birth defects allegedly linked to Bendectin.

Issue

What standard governs admissibility of scientific expert testimony under Rule 702?

Held

Trial judges must act as gatekeepers for reliable, relevant expert testimony.

Ratio Decidendi

Expert testimony must be reliable and fit the issues in the case.

Reasoning

Federal Rule of Evidence 702 displaced the older Frye general-acceptance test in federal court.

Significance

Core evidence case for expert admissibility.

Related Cases

No related cases listed.

Exam Tips

Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.

Sources