Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman [1990]
[1990] 2 AC 605 · House of Lords · United Kingdom
Issue
When does a duty of care arise for negligent misstatement?
Held
No duty was owed to investors for the takeover purpose.
Exam use
Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.
Summary
Leading UK duty of care case.
Facts
Issue
When does a duty of care arise for negligent misstatement?
Held
No duty was owed to investors for the takeover purpose.
Ratio Decidendi
The Caparo test asks foreseeability, proximity, and fairness for novel duty situations.
Reasoning
Essay-Ready Explanation Generator
Version 1 of 4
Reference to Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman ([1990] 2 AC 605) strengthens a tort law answer because the case reflects the principle that The Caparo test asks foreseeability, proximity, and fairness for novel duty situations. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as When does a duty of care arise for negligent misstatement? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.
Significance
Related Cases
No related cases listed.
Exam Tips
Revision Checklist
- Name the issue before discussing facts so the marker sees the legal question immediately.
- State the holding in one sentence, then use the ratio to explain why the court reached that result.
- Use the citation and jurisdiction to show why this authority matters for the problem you are answering.
- Pair this case with one supporting or contrasting authority if the question tests limits, policy, or exceptions.