Super Smoke N Save LLC, Two Strains Cannabis Company LLC, Brecken Gold Athletics NYC LLC, Breckenridge Café NYC LLC, and 100 North 3rd LTD D/B/A 7 Leaf Clover, against New York State Cannabis Control Board, New York State Office of Cannabis Management, Tremaine Wright, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the New York State Cannabis Control Board, Felicia Reid, in her official capacity as Interim Executive Director of the New York State Office of Cannabis Management, the New York City Sheriff's Office, and Anthony Miranda, in his official capacity as New York City Sheriff [2025]

Version 1 of 4

Reference to Super Smoke N Save LLC, Two Strains Cannabis Company LLC, Brecken Gold Athletics NYC LLC, Breckenridge Café NYC LLC, and 100 North 3rd LTD D/B/A 7 Leaf Clover, against New York State Cannabis Control Board, New York State Office of Cannabis Management, Tremaine Wright, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the New York State Cannabis Control Board, Felicia Reid, in her official capacity as Interim Executive Director of the New York State Office of Cannabis Management, the New York City Sheriff's Office, and Anthony Miranda, in his official capacity as New York City Sheriff (2025 NY Slip Op 25009) strengthens a Cannabis Law answer because the case reflects the principle that Use this case as a source-verified research checkpoint rather than an invented rule statement. The ratio should be extracted from the linked opinion by identifying the legal test applied, the facts treated as decisive, and the court's stated reason for the outcome. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as What Cannabis Law issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.