BLOCKTREE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Corsair Investments, WA, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Cytline, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 509 Mine, LLC, a Washington limited liability company MIM Investors, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Miners United, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Telco 214 Wholesale Software, Inc., a Washington corporation Mark Vargas, an individual Wehash Technology, LLP, a Washington limited liability company v. PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation Terry Brewer, individually and in his official capacity Bob Bernd, individually and in his official capacity Dale Walker, individually and in his official capacity Tom Flint, individually and in his official capacity Larry Schaapman, individually and in his official capacity Does 1-10, managers and employees of Grant PUD, individually and in their official capacities [2019]

Version 1 of 4

Reference to BLOCKTREE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Corsair Investments, WA, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Cytline, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 509 Mine, LLC, a Washington limited liability company MIM Investors, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Miners United, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Telco 214 Wholesale Software, Inc., a Washington corporation Mark Vargas, an individual Wehash Technology, LLP, a Washington limited liability company v. PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation Terry Brewer, individually and in his official capacity Bob Bernd, individually and in his official capacity Dale Walker, individually and in his official capacity Tom Flint, individually and in his official capacity Larry Schaapman, individually and in his official capacity Does 1-10, managers and employees of Grant PUD, individually and in their official capacities (380 F. Supp. 3d 1102) strengthens a Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law answer because the case reflects the principle that Use this case as a source-verified research checkpoint rather than an invented rule statement. The ratio should be extracted from the linked opinion by identifying the legal test applied, the facts treated as decisive, and the court's stated reason for the outcome. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as What Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Law issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.