THE ESTATE OF Clayton LOCKETT, BY AND THROUGH its personal representative Gary LOCKETT v. Governor Mary FALLIN, in her individual capacity Robert C. Patton, in his individual capacity Anita Trammell, in her individual capacity Doctor John Doe, American Civil Liberties Union American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma Doctors for the Ethical Practice of Medicine: Dr. Lucas Restrepo, Clinical Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of California, Dr. Steven Miles, Professor of Medicine and Bioethics at the University of Minnesota Medical School in Minneapolis, Dr. Robert L. Cohen, Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine, NYU Member, New York City Board of Correction, Dr. John P. May, Regional Medical Director of Florida Region for Wexford Health Sources, and Consultant on Correctional Healthcare to the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division Dr. Marc Stern, Affiliate Assistant Professor, Health Services at the University of Washington, formerly the Health Services Director for the Washington State Department of Corrections Dr. Scott Allen, Professor of Medicine, Associate Dean of Academic Affairs, University of California Riverside School of Medicine Dr. Josiah D. Rich, Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown University and Director of the Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights Dr. Robert Greifinger, Professor (Adjunct) of Health and Criminal Justice and Distinguished Research Fellow at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City and correctional health care policy and quality management consultant Dr. Coleman Pratt, Chief Medical Officer, Health Center in Florida, former Medical Director for Prison Health Services Dr. David Nicholl, Consultant Neurologist at Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospital, UK Dr. John Henning Schumann, Gussman Family Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, Amici Curiae [2016]

841 F.3d 1098 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · United States

Bioethics Lawbioethics-lawBioethics Lawsource verificationcase researchexam authority table

Issue

What Bioethics Law issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion?

Held

Source-linked holding checkpoint: the search record does not safely provide the full dispositive holding. Confirm the judgment in the linked source before using this case as controlling authority.

Exam use

Summary

What Bioethics Law issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion?

Facts

Issue

What Bioethics Law issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion?

Held

Source-linked holding checkpoint: the search record does not safely provide the full dispositive holding. Confirm the judgment in the linked source before using this case as controlling authority.

Ratio Decidendi

Use this case as a source-verified research checkpoint rather than an invented rule statement. The ratio should be extracted from the linked opinion by identifying the legal test applied, the facts treated as decisive, and the court's stated reason for the outcome.

Reasoning

Essay-Ready Explanation Generator

Version 1 of 4

Reference to THE ESTATE OF Clayton LOCKETT, BY AND THROUGH its personal representative Gary LOCKETT v. Governor Mary FALLIN, in her individual capacity Robert C. Patton, in his individual capacity Anita Trammell, in her individual capacity Doctor John Doe, American Civil Liberties Union American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma Doctors for the Ethical Practice of Medicine: Dr. Lucas Restrepo, Clinical Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of California, Dr. Steven Miles, Professor of Medicine and Bioethics at the University of Minnesota Medical School in Minneapolis, Dr. Robert L. Cohen, Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine, NYU Member, New York City Board of Correction, Dr. John P. May, Regional Medical Director of Florida Region for Wexford Health Sources, and Consultant on Correctional Healthcare to the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division Dr. Marc Stern, Affiliate Assistant Professor, Health Services at the University of Washington, formerly the Health Services Director for the Washington State Department of Corrections Dr. Scott Allen, Professor of Medicine, Associate Dean of Academic Affairs, University of California Riverside School of Medicine Dr. Josiah D. Rich, Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown University and Director of the Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights Dr. Robert Greifinger, Professor (Adjunct) of Health and Criminal Justice and Distinguished Research Fellow at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City and correctional health care policy and quality management consultant Dr. Coleman Pratt, Chief Medical Officer, Health Center in Florida, former Medical Director for Prison Health Services Dr. David Nicholl, Consultant Neurologist at Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospital, UK Dr. John Henning Schumann, Gussman Family Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, Amici Curiae (841 F.3d 1098) strengthens a Bioethics Law answer because the case reflects the principle that Use this case as a source-verified research checkpoint rather than an invented rule statement. The ratio should be extracted from the linked opinion by identifying the legal test applied, the facts treated as decisive, and the court's stated reason for the outcome. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as What Bioethics Law issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.

Underlying Concepts

  • bioethics-law
  • Bioethics Law
  • source verification
  • case research
  • exam authority table

Significance

Related Cases

No related cases listed.

Exam Tips

Revision Checklist

  • Name the issue before discussing facts so the marker sees the legal question immediately.
  • State the holding in one sentence, then use the ratio to explain why the court reached that result.
  • Use the citation and jurisdiction to show why this authority matters for the problem you are answering.
  • Pair this case with one supporting or contrasting authority if the question tests limits, policy, or exceptions.