Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948]
[1948] 1 KB 223 · Court of Appeal · England & Wales
Issue
When will a court quash an administrative decision on grounds of unreasonableness?
Held
The challenge failed because the condition did not meet the very high threshold for legal unreasonableness.
Exam use
Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.
Summary
Canonical statement of irrationality review in common-law administrative law.
Facts
Issue
When will a court quash an administrative decision on grounds of unreasonableness?
Held
The challenge failed because the condition did not meet the very high threshold for legal unreasonableness.
Ratio Decidendi
Wednesbury unreasonableness remains the classic high-threshold irrationality standard for judicial review, subject to later refinement in rights-sensitive contexts.
Reasoning
Significance
Related Cases
No related cases listed.
Exam Tips
Revision Checklist
- Name the issue before discussing facts so the marker sees the legal question immediately.
- State the holding in one sentence, then use the ratio to explain why the court reached that result.
- Use the citation and jurisdiction to show why this authority matters for the problem you are answering.
- Pair this case with one supporting or contrasting authority if the question tests limits, policy, or exceptions.