In RE: VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Cargo Agents, Inc.; International Transport Management Corp.; And Manaco International Forwarders, Inc.; Appellants in 15-3853 Martens Cars of Washington, Inc.; Hudson Charleston Acquisition, LLC D/B/A Hudson Nissan; John O'Neil Johnson Toyota, LLC; Hudson Gastonia Acquisition, LLC; HC Acquisition, LLC D/B/A Toyota of Bristol; Desert European Motorcars, Ltd; Hodges Imported Cars, Inc. D/B/A Hodges Subaru; Scotland Car Yard Enterprises D/B/A San Rafael Mitsubishi; Hartley Buick/ GMC Truck, Inc. D/B/A Hartley Honda; Panama City Automotive Group, Inc. D/B/A John Lee Nissan; Empire Nissan of Santa Rosa, LLC, Appellants in 15-3354 End Payor Plaintiffs; Truck and Equipment Dealer Plaintiffs, Appellants in 15-3355 [2017]

Version 1 of 4

Reference to In RE: VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Cargo Agents, Inc.; International Transport Management Corp.; And Manaco International Forwarders, Inc.; Appellants in 15-3853 Martens Cars of Washington, Inc.; Hudson Charleston Acquisition, LLC D/B/A Hudson Nissan; John O'Neil Johnson Toyota, LLC; Hudson Gastonia Acquisition, LLC; HC Acquisition, LLC D/B/A Toyota of Bristol; Desert European Motorcars, Ltd; Hodges Imported Cars, Inc. D/B/A Hodges Subaru; Scotland Car Yard Enterprises D/B/A San Rafael Mitsubishi; Hartley Buick/ GMC Truck, Inc. D/B/A Hartley Honda; Panama City Automotive Group, Inc. D/B/A John Lee Nissan; Empire Nissan of Santa Rosa, LLC, Appellants in 15-3354 End Payor Plaintiffs; Truck and Equipment Dealer Plaintiffs, Appellants in 15-3355 (846 F.3d 71) strengthens a Antitrust Law answer because the case reflects the principle that Use this case as a source-verified research checkpoint rather than an invented rule statement. The ratio should be extracted from the linked opinion by identifying the legal test applied, the facts treated as decisive, and the court's stated reason for the outcome. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as What Antitrust Law issue does the source record raise, and how should a student verify the rule, holding, and factual trigger from the linked opinion? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.