Sales (UCC Article 2) Practice Tests
Practice Sales (UCC Article 2) exam questions covering core doctrines, issue spotting, applied analysis, and exam-ready explanations.
How To Study This Subject
Learn the rule
Read the outline and identify the elements, exceptions, and policy tensions.
Test recall
Use the 20 free questions first, then move into timed premium sets.
Apply cases
Connect leading authorities to problem-question facts and ratio-based reasoning.
Write under time
Turn missed topics into IRAC plans and short timed answers.
Related Case Briefs
Medical Supply Chain, Inc. v. USF Insurance Co.
2010 WL 3528965
Under UCC § 2-327, in a sale on approval, risk of loss does not pass to the buyer until acceptance.
Latham & Associates, Inc. v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.
1995 WL 655833
Under UCC § 2-328, in an auction without reserve, goods cannot be withdrawn once the auction is announced; the highest bidder prevails.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
603 U.S. ___
This case is included to alert exam-takers that Chevron deference is no longer applicable; UCC interpretation follows ordinary principles of statutory construction.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
597 U.S. 215
This case is included solely to remind exam-takers not to treat Roe as controlling law; for Article 2 study, use only UCC authorities.
Mather v. Casa de Animales, Inc.
178 So. 3d 992
Under UCC Article 2, living animals are goods, and implied warranties of merchantability and fitness may apply to their sale.
Central Illinois Energy Cooperative v. Dynegy Marketing and Trade
2011 IL App (4th) 110106-U
Under UCC § 2-609, a party with reasonable grounds for insecurity may demand adequate assurance of performance and suspend their own performance until it is given.
Monsanto Co. v. Scruggs
342 F. Supp. 2d 602
Under UCC § 2-312, a seller warrants good title and no liens, but the buyer may waive this warranty by knowing of defects.
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino, S.p.A.
144 F.3d 1384
Under UCC § 2-202, the parol evidence rule does not exclude evidence of additional terms unless the writing was intended as a complete and exclusive statement of the agreement.