Refugee and Asylum Law Practice Tests
Practice Refugee and Asylum Law exam questions covering core doctrines, issue spotting, applied analysis, and exam-ready explanations.
How To Study This Subject
Learn the rule
Read the outline and identify the elements, exceptions, and policy tensions.
Test recall
Use the 20 free questions first, then move into timed premium sets.
Apply cases
Connect leading authorities to problem-question facts and ratio-based reasoning.
Write under time
Turn missed topics into IRAC plans and short timed answers.
Related Case Briefs
Matter of J-F-F-
27 I&N Dec. 598 (A.G. 2020)
A particularly serious crime determination is case-specific; DUI may qualify if it involves significant harm or aggravating factors.
A, B and C v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Case C-148/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2406
Gender-related persecution may qualify; a social group of 'women in a country' is too broad; a narrower subgroup is required.
X, Y and Z v. Minister voor Immigratie
Case C-199/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:720
Asylum seekers should not be subjected to degrading methods to prove sexual orientation; the assessment must respect human dignity.
HJ (Iran) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2010] UKSC 31
A person cannot be required to live discreetly to avoid persecution; the right to live openly as a member of a particular social group is protected.
Vraciu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
[2009] FC 161
Sur place claims arise when circumstances change after leaving the country; the state's knowledge of the opinion is key.
Refugee Appeal No. 76060
[2008] NZAR 376 (RSAA)
A gender-based group must be defined with particularity; broad groups like 'women' are insufficient without additional defining characteristics.
Malaysian Refugee Convention case: A v. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[2002] HCA 29
For a stateless person, the country of former habitual residence can be the country of reference for internal protection.
Orellana v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
[2002] FCJ No. 1051
Exclusion under Article 1F(a) requires a serious reason for considering that the person committed or was complicit in crimes against humanity.